Cofibrant is a provable security ADR for AI
exploitation of legacy code, with no code changes and negligible performance impact.
It’s not about how fast you can patch anymoreBinary exploitation that took nation-states months to develop now takes days with modern AI frameworks. CISA and ENISA have sounded the alarm as vulnerability discovery explodes while time-to-exploit crushes., it’s about how deterministic you can be about your security posture.
“Security teams don’t want more findings to triage, they want problems that go away. Cofibrant’s approach is to eliminate memory corruption exploits at build time.”
Firmware ships once and runs for a decade, on hardware with no to little room for a rewrite or patch. A guarantee enforced at build time still holds no matter the patching timeline.
Millions of lines of C, C++, etc. maintained by volunteers and shipped into everything downstream. We validated our guarantees on FFmpeg, one of the harder real-world targets, at extremely low overhead.
Decades of working legacy code that nobody can afford to rewrite. We harden with no code changes and no new toolchain, so the guarantee enforces in the pipeline you already run.
Cofibrant builds tools that sit in your CI/CD pipeline and make memory-unsafe languages like C, C++, provably secure from exploits like Remote Code Execution via memory corruption.
We don't scan for, remediate, or patch vulnerabilities. We analyse source-code and insert runtime guards in the binary.


















No source, binaries or build logs leave your network. Your data stays yours.
We pin our single open-source dependency to a reviewed release and never follow the head of a branch, so an upstream compromise has no route into your build through us.
Enforcements come from an upper bound of program behavior, so correctness is preserved, test suites are unaffected, and the guarantee holds through new releases.
Memory-corruption exploits like RCE stops being a category you triage and starts being a category that cannot occur.
Patch deadlines follow what an attacker gains from a bug. Rule out code execution and this class leaves the emergency queue.
of the 689 remote-code-execution entries in CISA’s exploited-vulnerability catalogue reach it through memory corruption.
28% of all exploited RCE.Remediation deadlines are set by how much control an attacker gains.
Total control This class leaves the emergency queue.SourcesCounts computed from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (1,673 entries, August 2026): 689 give remote code execution, and 192 of those reach it through a memory-corruption weakness. Remediation times from Edgescan and field patching data; deadline tiers from BOD 26-04.
| Property | Patching | SAST scanning | Rust rewrite | Fil-C | Cofibrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keeps your existing C and C++ source | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
| No new toolchain or runtime to adopt | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
| Negligible performance cost | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| Covers bugs nobody has found yet | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
| Holds without ongoing tuning | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
| No findings queue to work through | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
| Everything above, in one buildCofibrant is the only column checked on every row above. Stacking the others does not close the gap: the two approaches that cover undiscovered bugs are the two that cost you your existing build. | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Full spatial and temporal memory safety | no | no | yes | yes | no |
NoteSAST finds real bugs early and we would still run it; it is detection rather than a guarantee, so what it misses stays missed. A Rust rewrite and memory-safe runtime like Fil-C both give full memory safety, a stronger guarantee than we do. However, this comes with heavy engineering or performance overheads while our minimal enforcements guarantee no exploit possible via memory corruption, for example RCE, the most dangerous exploit.
Tell us a little about your team and we'll reach out as soon as a place frees up.
Prefer email? contact@cofibrant.ai